Reparations in New York: Meaningful Progress or Political Dead End?

As the New York State Community Commission on Reparations Remedies (NYSCCRR) prepares to hold a public hearing in Rochester on March 4, the question looms: Will these efforts lead to real policy changes, or are they symbolic gestures destined to fade amid political and financial opposition?

The hearing, set for 4 p.m. at the Memorial Art Gallery, will give residents the opportunity to share testimonies about the lasting impact of slavery and systemic discrimination, including the destruction of Rochester’s historic Clarissa Street neighborhood and the effects of urban renewal policies that displaced Black communities.

Dr. Seanelle Hawkins, chair of the NYSCCRR, remains optimistic. “It is essential community members not only share their experiences, but also put forth recommendations and ideas that will lead to remedies that will right the wrongs of slavery,” she said.

Since its creation in 2023, the commission has received $5 million in state funding, with Governor Kathy Hochul recently proposing another $5 million and a one-year extension. However, financial concerns and political realities could limit how far these efforts go.

In California, the state’s Reparations Task Force made sweeping recommendations—including direct cash payments to descendants of enslaved people—but the state legislature and Governor Gavin Newsom have thus far stopped short of enacting them, opting instead for a formal apology and non-monetary policy proposals. Similar challenges exist in New York. While the commission has a broad mandate, it lacks the power to enact legislation, meaning any reparations policy would require approval from the state legislature and the governor.

Some critics argue that reparations are too costly and politically impractical. Opponents in New York question whether taxpayers—many of whom have no ancestral connection to slavery—would support such measures. Others contend that tackling systemic inequities through broader economic and social policies would be a more feasible alternative.

While some cities, such as Evanston, Illinois, have implemented limited reparations programs, no U.S. state has yet approved direct financial compensation to descendants of enslaved people.

In New York, the reparations commission’s findings will shape future legislative proposals, but the political landscape remains uncertain. With rising budget concerns and divided political opinions, any meaningful reparations law faces an uphill battle.

Still, supporters believe momentum is building. Hochul’s continued financial support suggests the conversation isn’t going away. Whether this translates into real policy or remains a largely symbolic gesture will depend on the political will of lawmakers—and the voices of the public.

How to Participate

Community members unable to attend the Rochester hearing in person can watch via livestream at www.ny.gov/reparations. Written comments can be submitted via email to ReparationsCommission@reparations.ny.gov or by calling (518) 473–3997.